utnereader:

The Loving Story: Check out the January/February 2012 issue of Humanities magazine for a terrific article about the historic U.S. Supreme Court case that gave interracial couples the legal right to marry in the United States. At the heart of the case is a couple, Richard and  Mildred Loving, whose uncompromising love survived despite a hostile  environment, multiple arrests for living together as husband and wife,  and an eventual 25-year banishment decree from their home state of  Virginia. According to Humanities:

The Lovings had broken the state’s 1924 Racial Integrity Act,  a law that went to nearly insane lengths to keep anyone with even one  drop of black blood from mixing with a white person.

It’s hard not to notice the striking similarity between the Racial Integrity Act, struck down by Loving v. Virginia in 1967, and the Defense of Marriage Act. Both rely on morally weighted  language (“integrity” and “defense”), trying to disguise what the laws  really are: one racist and one homophobic, both profoundly  discriminatory.
Keep reading …

utnereader:

The Loving Story: Check out the January/February 2012 issue of Humanities magazine for a terrific article about the historic U.S. Supreme Court case that gave interracial couples the legal right to marry in the United States. At the heart of the case is a couple, Richard and Mildred Loving, whose uncompromising love survived despite a hostile environment, multiple arrests for living together as husband and wife, and an eventual 25-year banishment decree from their home state of Virginia. According to Humanities:

The Lovings had broken the state’s 1924 Racial Integrity Act, a law that went to nearly insane lengths to keep anyone with even one drop of black blood from mixing with a white person.

It’s hard not to notice the striking similarity between the Racial Integrity Act, struck down by Loving v. Virginia in 1967, and the Defense of Marriage Act. Both rely on morally weighted language (“integrity” and “defense”), trying to disguise what the laws really are: one racist and one homophobic, both profoundly discriminatory.

Keep reading …

  1. thrive22 reblogged this from krazyforyou
  2. salofreakinme reblogged this from utnereader
  3. lotsandconfused reblogged this from usedtobeskarr
  4. usedtobeskarr reblogged this from utnereader
  5. dwarfpyramid reblogged this from sickeninglyliberal
  6. sickeninglyliberal reblogged this from utnereader
  7. metamorphoseandbodhi reblogged this from utnereader and added:
    by Danielle Magnuson...Another detail that bears mentioning as the world discusses whether...
  8. killakeish reblogged this from utnereader
  9. grouchylizard reblogged this from utnereader
  10. gnattiekong reblogged this from utnereader
  11. shasou reblogged this from utnereader and added:
    2012年、1・2月号のHumanitiesは、アメリカ最高裁判所が異人種カップルに結婚する権利を認めたときのストーリーが特集されています。...
  12. mustapha--mond reblogged this from utnereader
  13. theatrelover322 reblogged this from lulu12eureka
  14. babybisbat reblogged this from utnereader
  15. wozziebear reblogged this from utnereader
  16. workforfitness reblogged this from mimorena
  17. arborwin reblogged this from utnereader
  18. mimorena reblogged this from utnereader
  19. lulu12eureka reblogged this from utnereader
  20. viviano reblogged this from sarahlee310
  21. theyoungenigma reblogged this from ladyazura
  22. ladyazura reblogged this from politicalmusicjunkie
  23. hearthechimes reblogged this from sarahlee310
  24. checkyesman reblogged this from utnereader
  25. sarahlee310 reblogged this from utnereader and added:
    HBO will start airing this documentary on Thursday, Feb. 23. Preview, more info and links to schedule here.
  26. buoneintenzioni reblogged this from utnereader
  27. sarochka reblogged this from utnereader
  28. politicalmusicjunkie reblogged this from utnereader
  29. serendipityschild reblogged this from utnereader and added:
    Yes, read all of it and consider the weight of love. Let love rule, not religion or laws that limit love from...